Is it obligatory for hospitals to provide copy of the case record to patient or his legal representative? |
Medico Legal Corner
eMediNexus Coverage from: 
Is it obligatory for hospitals to provide copy of the case record to patient or his legal representative?
Dr KK Aggarwal,  19 February 2021
Coronavirus Live Count Map India

remove_red_eye 622 Views
COVID-19 Vaccine Updates


0 Read Comments                

Yes, it is mandatory for doctors and hospitals to provide the copy of the case record or medical record to the patient or his legal representative. 

The Medical Council of India mandates doctors, as per the Indian Medical Council (Professional Ethics, Etiquette & Conduct) Regulations, 2002 notified on 11th March 2002, amended up to December 2010 to maintain the medical record and provide patient access to it.

Maintenance of Medical Records:

1.3.1. Every physician shall maintain the medical records pertaining to his/her indoor patients for a period of three years from the date of commencement of the treatment in a standard proforma laid down by the Medical Council of India and attached as Appendix 3.

1.3.2. If any request is made for medical records either by the patients/authorized attendant or legal authorities involved, the same may be duly acknowledged and documents shall be issued within the period of 72 hours.

Under the MCI Regulations, 2002 it is clear that the patient has a right to claim medical records for his treatment and the doctors/hospitals are under obligation to maintain them and provide them to the patient on request. 

In Kanaiyalal Ramanlal Trivedi v Dr. Satyanarayan Vishwakarma  I (1997) CPJ 332 (Guj), The Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat has held that the hospital and doctor were held guilty of deficiency in service as case records were not produced before the court to refute the allegation of a lack of standard care.

In Raghunath Raheja v Maharashtra Medical Council, AIR 1996 Bom 198, Bombay High Court upheld the right of patient to medical record very emphatically. 

In the matter titled as P.P. Ismail v K.K. Radha 1999 CPJ 99 (NC), the Hon’ble National Commission for Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum has held the hospital vicariously liable for the negligent action of the doctor on the basis of the bill showing the professional fees of the doctor and the discharge certificate under the letterhead of the hospital signed by the doctor 

In S.A.Quereshi v Padode memorial Hospital and Research Centre II 2000. CPJ 463 (Bhopal) it was held that the plea of destroying the case sheet as per the general practice of the hospitals appeared to the court as an attempt to suppress certain facts that are likely to be revealed from the case sheet. 

In case of Dr. Shyam Kumar v Rameshbhai, Harmanbhai Kachiya I (2006) CPJ 16 (NC), the Hon’ble National Commission of Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum has held that not producing medical records to the patient prevents the complainant from seeking an expert opinion and it is the duty of the person in possession of the medical records to produce it in the court and adverse inference could be drawn for not producing the records.

In Medi. Supri. Loknayak Jaiprakash Narayan Hospital & Ors. V/s. K.M. Santosh. F.A. No. 244/2008, decided on 14/03/2016, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has observed that it is the primary responsibility of the hospital to maintain and produce patient records on demand by the patient or appropriate judicial bodies. The patient or their legal heirs can ask for copies of the treatment records that have to be provided within 72 hours. The hospital can charge a reasonable amount for the administrative purposes including photocopying the documents. Failure to provide medical records to patients on proper demand will amount to deficiency in service and negligence.
To comment on this article,
create a free account.
Sign Up to instantly read 30000+ free Articles & 1000+ Case Studies
Create Account

Already registered?

Login Now