EXPLORE!

Is Automated and Unobserved Office BP Measurement in CKD the Need of the Hour?

  939 Views

Dr Nikhil Bhasin    28 December 2018

Dr Hardik Shah, Dr Nikhil Bhasin, Dr Hardik Shah, Dr Dilip Kirpalani, Dr Ashok Kirpalani; Mumbai

A single clinic BP reading (by sphygmomanometer) may be useful but does not reflect the true 24-hour BP pattern. Additionally, there is a high incidence of white-coat effect in CKD patients. BP in resting state is more important in reducing target organ damage. 24-hour ambulatory BP is costly and cumbersome and not easily accepted by patients. Therefore, a simple surrogate is the need of the hour - Home BP; automated office BP (AOBP). This study included 160 CKD outpatients who needed 24-hour ABPM. They underwent prior office BP measurements with 3 methods - single sphygmomanometric BP (SPBP), single observed oscillometric BP (SOBP) and AOBP. These readings were then compared with average daytime ABPM.

The study concluded that AOBP is a very useful and cost-effective alternative to 24-hour ABPM in the assessment of white-coat effect in CKD. AOBP better predicts the average daytime ABPM as compared to routine mercury (SPBP)/SOBP office BP measurements. The AOBP method clearly scores over SOBP in eliminating much of the white-coat effect. Therefore, universal use of AOBP is recommended in CKD to avoid unnecessary over-aggressive reduction of BP in an attempt to reduce target organ damage.

To comment on this article,
create a free account.

Sign Up to instantly get access to 10000+ Articles & 1000+ Cases

Already registered?

Login Now

Most Popular Articles

News and Updates

eMediNexus provides latest updates on medical news, medical case studies from India. In-depth medical case studies and research designed for doctors and healthcare professionals.